Date   : Sat, 11 Dec 1999 20:51:17 GMT
From   : hick@... (gARetH baBB)
Subject: Re: Dunjunz (Was: I think I must have a say in all this. It is LONG! So print it.)

In message <10.199912112004.UAA02576@...>,
          frank@... (Frank Lee) wrote:

> surprising, really. It used to violently object to the presence of the +1,
> even when apparently disabled.)

I remember extending fx163,128 to fully disable it - the normal Plus 1
fx163,128 left something running, either serial IRQs (running off service
call 5) or ADC IRQs (also running off service call 5).