<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:27:50 +0100
From   : "Rich Talbot-Watkins" <Richard_Watkins@...>
Subject: Re: Copying BBC games naughty naughty

"Tom Seddon" <T.W.Seddon@...> wrote:

> hang on, wasn't it <exec> <load> <length> -- certainly I remember it's
> different from the DFS as this caused me much confusion a few (OK, about
> 12) years ago.

and then...
"Rich Talbot-Watkins" <Richard_Watkins@...> wrote:


> Might be actually, cos it displays the block number, then the actual
length,
> and then the other two addresses, e.g
>
> Chuckie    4D  4D70  FFFF1100 FFFF1145
>   ^         ^    ^      ^         ^
> name      block len   load       exec

OK, so I've just got back this morning, and noticed that my reply actually
suggested a THIRD order instead of confirming or denying either of the other
two!  I nominate myself for "Least Helpful Follow-up 2001".

I actually think it IS the order I described above though... but before I go
confusing things even more, I'm just gonna shut up...

Rich :)
<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>