Date   : Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:58:32 -0000
From   : Tim Matthews <tim.matthews@...>
Subject: Re: Circuits involving a SAA5050? getting horribly OT

Obviously i might appear biased but the licence fee is much fairer than
advertising funded telly. If you don't want a telly - you don't pay for a
licence. But if you don't want a telly, you still pay for stuff you buy to
be advertised on it.
ITV et al are not for free, remember.

The only completely 'fair' way is for subscription only or pay-as-you-view -
which would result in rubbish programming.

People whinging about the licence fee is like people who haven't been ill
complaining about having to fund the NHS.

Sorry to go so OT, but feeble arguments and ridiculous comparisons get my
goat. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Fraser [mailto:colin@...] 
> Sent: 25 February 2002 14:44
> To: 'Michael McConnell'; 'Kris Adcock'
> Cc: bbc-micro@...
> Subject: RE: [BBC-Micro] Circuits involving a SAA5050?

> Tell that to the judge.
> If you have equipment that can receive TV signals, it'll be 
> up to you to prove you haven't been using it. Personally, I 
> don't the TV license is any more justifiable than a tax on 
> the use of toasters or fridges, but we don't live in a free country...
> 
> Colin f
> 


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use,
copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify
the sender immediately. 
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent
or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.