Date   : Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:14:08 +0000 (GMT)
From   : Brian Widdas <brian@...>
Subject: Re: ?86 and ?87

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andrew W wrote:

> I'm just wondering if anybody could suggest what might be interfering
> with ?&86 and ?&87. As far as I can see I'm just changing ?86 and just
> setting ?87 once yet ?87 is turning from a value of 30 into 2,5,6 etc and
> ?86 into unexpectedly large values (although that could be my code not
> doing what it should). I'm writing a word to !84 but that should just
> set 84 and 85 should it not?

My memory may be a little rusty, but doesn't ! write a 4-byte word?

Brian
-- 
   *  *   * *  **       *  * ** ** *   *
   *  ** *      *      ** *   *  *    *
 *    *        *     *  *             *