<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:54:24 GMT
From   : Pete Turnbull <pete@...>
Subject: Re: ...at line ___

On Nov 30 2004, 16:48, Andrew W wrote:
> In <URL:news:local.misc> on Sun 28 Nov, Pete Turnbull wrote:

> > You don't need the JMP and you can remove "LDY&72" from the end of
the
> > previous section.
> >
> Thanks -  it seems to be the JMP and LDY&72 that were causing it to
fail
> although I don't understand why as when I remove them the code works.

They shouldn't affect the logic.  I suspect something else is causing
the problem.  Have you reserved enough space for the code?  Could
something else be overwriting the end of the code?  What happens if you
replace the two instructions with 5 NOPs?


-- 
Pete                                           Peter Turnbull
                                               Network Manager
                                               University of York
<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>