Date   : Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:47:16 +0000 (GMT)
From   : Andrew W <a.weston2@...>
Subject: Re: ...at line ___

In <URL:news:local.misc> on Thu 02 Dec, Johan Heuseveldt wrote:

> 
> > The next section of code is at &79FE using 50 bytes giving &7A30.
> 
> Ah, that could be a clue. The code is wrapping a 256 bytes page border.
> Some opcodes take that into account, some don't.
> So you need to do some checking on that. 
> 
> Sorry I can't be more specific. Some basic textbooks are not within
> reasonable reach.
> 
The book I've been using makes no reference to page borders. To be
honest I'm a bit surprised they matter as I thought they were just
nominal divisions in the memory map. Given the existence of the bugs
mentioned here though it seems like this could be the problem. It'll
also be a problem no doubt when I come to compact them - in fact I've
tried once and got the zero-byte error reported.

regards,


A.Weston
-- 
Staffordshire, UK of GB&NI.