Date   : Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:56:58 -0800 (PST)
From   : "F. Haroon" <haroonnet2002@...>
Subject: Re: The importance of GoMMC (oops - delete previous copy)

Sorry, this was meant to be posted to the list not just you Mark.

--- Mark Cooke <mpc@...> wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 14:36 -0800, F. Haroon wrote:
> > Only three people have mentioned that they rather have this taken
> off
> > the list.
> 
> Let's make that 4 shall we. This is sent directly to you so it
> doesn't
> spam the list.  Your implicit assumption that silence is acceptance
> is
> not true in my case.

Silence is not acceptance.  I'm trying to break the silence.  Just read
what I said carefully in my mail  - this is not a John Kortink trolling
session.  Forget about him for now.  What are WE going to do?  You
either want the market to survive or you are too resigned to it's
demise, it's as simple as that.  I'm not resigned to it's demise.  I'm
sure some others aren't and are on the list.

I am posting this on the list again, so that we can all establish who
really is resigned and not bothered (therefore considers this spam),
and who really believes GoMMC is an opportunity to move things FORWARD,
not re-hash what's already been.  Those of you who already have the
GoMMC and support no problem, we could share out the support for
everyone.  Either we get ourselves back on the GoMMC list by enabling
all of us to have the hardware, or we make a seperate support list
ourselves.  Think about it folks, let's make some solutions.

Fiaz.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com