Date : Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:51:11 +1100 (EST)
From : Peter Craven <cjl_craves@...>
Subject: Re: Possible EPROM???
Well does anyone know how to:-
>'The only thing to remember is to put your ROM file
> at the 'end' of the EPROM.
on a Solidisk EPROM Progeammer?????
--- Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk@...>
wrote:
> A. J. Davis wrote:
> > Peter Craven wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> Can a the following EPROM be used in a Master
> >> Computer:
> >>
> >> The 27C512-90 is a 64k x 8 bits 90ns CMOS EPROM
> with a
> >> transparent glass window allowing the device to
> be
> >> erased and written over multiple of times by the
> >> programmer.
> >> Features:
> >>
> >> * 5V +/-10% Supply Voltage in Read Operation
> >> * 90ns fast access time
> >> * Low power consumption: Active Current 30mA;
> >> Standby Current 100ľA
> >> * Programming voltage: 12.75V +/-0.25V
> >> * Programming time: 6 seconds (Presto IIB
> >> Algorithm)
> >> * Electronic signature
> >> * Ideally suited for microprocessor systems
> >> * Organisation: 65,536 x 8 bits
> >> * UV Erasable
> >>
> >> Cat No. Z9359
> >> Category: ICs - EPROMS
> >> Support: 27C512-90 64k x 8 90nS EPROM (Z9359)
> >>
> >>
> >> Dr Peter Craven (MBBS Uni. of Qld)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > I have some AMD 27C512-120 which work ok.
>
> I certainly expect it's electrically compatible...
>
> > The only thing to remember is to put your ROM file
> at the 'end' of the
> > EPROM. So, if you have a 16k ROM image the first
> 48k must be blank.
> > This is what I found when putting a 16K Wordwise
> image onto a 32k chip
> > anyway.
>
> Hmm, I guess that makes sense - the Master
> *probably* happens to tie the
> top few address lines high
>
> Differences between the typical 272128 (16K x 8) and
> the 27512:
>
> pin 27128 27512
> 1 vpp A15
> 22 -oe -oe / vpp
> 27 -pgm A14
>
> ... so for normal operation -oe (pin 22) will be the
> same between both
> devices (it just has a dual function on the 27512
> for programming
> conditions).
>
> pin 27 - A14 on the 27512 - will always be held high
> by the Master
> because it expects that to be the pin which is
> active low when
> programming and high during normal operation.
>
> pin 1 is the strange one, beause I'm surprised the
> Master doesn't tie
> vpp to 0V for the expected 27128 device (and so for
> a 27512 A15 would be
> low and Master would end up addressing the chip in
> the second quarter of
> the chip's address space, not the last quarter).
> Maybe the EPROM specs
> say that vpp should be set to the programming
> voltage during programming
> and 5V otherwise, then things would work. Or maybe
> it's a jumper change
> on the Master board?
>
> cheers
>
> Jules
>
>
Dr Peter Craven (MBBS Uni. of Qld)
12 Treacher St
Mt Gravatt
QLD 4122
Ph (H): (07) 3349 0820
____________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Never miss an Instant Message - Yahoo! Messenger for SMS
http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mweb/index.html