Date   : Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:07:47 -0500
From   : jules.richardson99@... (Jules Richardson)
Subject: The Micro User

Andrew wrote:
> To be honest, it does seem a shame to destroy any old Acorn magazines 
> given the non-permanancy of the web.

Yep, although the way I see it, people scan stuff to preserve it - sharing it 
on the web is merely a side effect (after all, the 'net isn't really fast 
enough yet and 'online' storage not cheap enough to really share good quality 
scans - some drop in quality from the original scanned versions is almost 
inevitable)

 > I'd prefer a slightly distorted
> image and the knowledge that they still exist in a well-kept library.

Do we have that knowledge? :)  I know NMoC have all the earlier ones, but I'm 
not sure about later issues.

I'm all for slightly distorted images on the web - but I still think people 
should be making the effort to scan at the highest possible quality.

cheers

J.