<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:44:31 +0200
From   : rick@... (Rick Murray)
Subject: Computing History Museum is interviewing Sophie

me@... wrote:

> Send questions to jason@...
CC'd. Here also if anybody wants to discuss.


Looking at the facilities of BBC BASIC, and the facilities of the MOS, 
it would appear that BASIC depends fairly heavily on MOS services.


My first question is - how much did the desired feature set of the BASIC 
interpreter influence the MOS facilities?

My second question - were there any feature(s) which were thought about 
that never got implemented in the interpreter; and if so, are there any 
that you regret not implementing?

My final question - which part of BASIC (BBC or RISC OS) was the most 
difficult?


Best wishes,

Rick.


-- 
Rick Murray, eeePC901 & ADSL WiFI'd into it, all ETLAs!
BBC B: DNFS, 2 x 5.25" floppies, EPROM prog, Acorn TTX
E01S FileStore, A3000/A5000/RiscPC/various PCs/blahblah...
<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>