Date   : Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:58:04 +0000
From   : robert@... (Rob)
Subject: Basic6809 1.00

On 08/11/2009, Rick Murray <rick@...> wrote:
> Jonathan Graham Harston wrote:
>
>> Yes, end_addr as in end_addr=start_addr+length. How else would you
>> define end_addr?
>
> *Save ... &8000 &8FFF saving code from (inclusive) &8000-&8FFF.
> The end is the end, not the byte after the end.
> That's how I'd define it.

I think about it as  *save xx first-byte last-byte and that works for
me.  Although I use +length much more often.


Rob