<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:32:30 +0100
From   : sai2791@... (Steve Inglis)
Subject: Does MOS 4.0 work properly in a full Master ?

Hey

Have you considered the CMOS ram, the hardware and code may have been changed
to deal with the EEPROM replacement.  I'm not sure that BeebEM would show
any problems since its not real hardware.


Steve


On 27 Aug 2010, at 16:57, paul aslin wrote:

> Oops forgot the other information.
> 
> I have located the code to change to implement the Y2K patch, change &19
to &20. I'll try that out in a minute in BeebEm to start with.
> 
> Is there anything else I need to patch in the MOS itself?
> 
> Also what versions of DFS and ADFS (non CF edition), are recommended ?
> 
> From: station240@...
> To: bbc-micro@...
> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 02:14:09 +1030
> Subject: [BBC-Micro] Does MOS 4.0 work properly in a full Master ?
> 
> I'm considering making a new 1mbit rom using MOS4.0, and adding ADFS, DFS
and anything else needed. Point being it originally is a 512kbit rom, so
installing it as the top half of a 1mbit rom leaves 4 unobstructed 16kbit
rom slots. 
> 
> Mark Haysman can recall having some problems with MOS 4.0 on the full hardware,
but can't remember the details.
> So far I know the userport, 1mhz bus and TUBE all work (I use an upgraded
Master ET as a econet file server), and I have found the tape filesystem
code appears complete.
> 
> I'm testing it at the moment in BeebEm also, with the MOS 3.2 DFS and ADFS
put back it seems to be working perfectly.
> 
> Am I missing something here ?
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________ bbc-micro mailing list
bbc-micro@...http://lists.cloud9.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/bbc-micro
_______________________________________________
> bbc-micro mailing list
> bbc-micro@...
> http://lists.cloud9.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/bbc-micro

<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>