<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Sun, 21 Nov 2010 02:35:30 +0100
From   : rick@... (Rick Murray)
Subject: [OT] Who'da thought...

On 20/11/2010 23:40, J.G.Harston wrote:

> Here, have a one-way 'plane ticket, on me, conditional on destroying
> your passport.

Sometimes I think that wouldn't be a bad idea. But, well, I kinda need 
some sort of official ID, so in the new year I'll be spending ?200 on a 
passport I don't need...


> Why should white kids born in this country automatically get rights
> that brown people born overseas have to study and work hard for?

Because everybody needs to "belong" to a place. This is what citizenship 
*is*.
Do we get rights in the country these "brown people" were born in? Even 
if we pass some sort of semi-bogus test? If they themselves do not have 
rights, I see that as a failing of their country, not ours.

And, indeed, the basic bottom line premise of the European Union, when 
everybody isn't trying to f**k it up, is to allow people to have means 
and rights in other countries. I don't mean the Daily Mail rant against 
immigrants (that is fail on behalf of the UK). I mean the bit where you 
are afforded the same degree of rights as a citizen after five years of 
peaceful occupancy. It is how I work and live in France.

Oh, and their method for determining who has been here five years? Easy 
- cough up your last five tax declarations. You'd be surprised how many 
people this catches out.

Wouldn't it be a terrible irony if I was able to live and work here, but 
would fail your UK test and have my citizenship taken away.


Out of interest - should the degree of melanin in a person's skin have 
any bearing on their ability to become a citizen? I find it interesting 
that you mention skin colour, while an Asian or American (or anybody 
outside of the obligations of the EU) could have equal difficulties.


> encountering some hard-of-thinking idiot slagging off immigrants who
> can spell better than he can,

Given some of the stuff I've seen on websites, I sometimes think a 
novice-level Russian student could write better than a lot of English.

Interestingly I was having a discussion about the Japanese school 
system, which is pretty lackadaisical compared to the Koreans. But in 
comparison to the schools I went to, it would be a total trauma. There 
is a massive difference in outlook in other countries. There's a sweet 
poster apparently for a college in Tokyo that says "learn English to 
pick up cute gaijin!". While... why do we learn French at school? 
Because it is part of the curriculum (well, it was in the late '80s). I 
passed three years of French and learned...

...are you ready...?


   1. Oo est le plag   (read it phonetically, not correctly)
   2. Bi?re, salop!    (perhaps how NOT to call a waitress)
   3. Encoul?-vous     (yes, it's quite rude)


Awesome. I've needed to use absolutely NONE of that in my time here.


> or when canvassing somebody who says they're "saving their vote for
> next year" !

How about my mother's stock response:
   "Don't vote, it only encourages them."

Of course, people like her are the reason why not so long ago the French 
elections were a run off between a normal politician and the National Front.
If enough respectable decent people can't be bothered to get up off 
their fat asses and tick a piece of paper, then the future of the 
country will be decided by lunatics.
[though some might argue it already is...]


> It's like one of the Driving Test questions: how would you check
> the oil? Truthful answer: I'd say to the garage attendant,

ROTFL ;-)

<flamebait> That's a bit of a girl answer, that. </> We blokes are 
supposed to know which end of a dipstick to poke in a cold tight space. 
Yeah, go on, bring your own subtext. It's 2am and I'm watching 
"Higurashi no Naku Koro ni" so it's no surprise my mind is a bit out there.


> I say my good chap, check that the oil is all ok, won't you.

... tell me you're making an example. You *do* know how to do 
lights'n'levels don't you?


> How many Parliamentary Constituencies are there? 464, 564, 646, 664.

Frankly, who gives a...? Four, five, or six hundred. It doesn't make 
much difference in the real world. How about learning how voting 
*works*? [and for bonus points, explain the US electoral college system, 
I know it has nothing to do with the UK, but in my simplistic little 
mind I kinda feel the guy with the most X's is the winner, but 
astonishingly the Americans managed to devise a different method...]


> I've just skimmed through 24 sample questions and most of my former
> constituents might be pushing it to get 4 or 5 correct.

So there you go. You're out of a job as all your constituents are no 
longer citizens.


I guess, in addition, a country would be insane to take citizenship away 
from its own civilians. As much as I might think Al Murray is a total 
<insert expletive> in his guise as a pub landlord, it might be people 
like him who can rouse up a little long-lost Dunkirk spirit if something 
as unthinkable as a war should ever touch the UK. But if you have a lot 
of non-citizens, they'd be likely to think "why-t-f do I care" or join 
in with the enemy.

I guess I am an anomaly having never really felt like I belonged 
anywhere or to any specific group. I recall Elma (God bless) once saying 
that being alone during breaks must surely be soul destroying. No, 
loneliness is a path of life that I choose. Call me anything you like 
(and if it helps, I pretty much fit the official 
will-become-a-rampaging-psychopath profile, not that tick-box profiles 
are worth the paper they're written on if you ask me), anyway, call me 
what you like but I rather like my life simple and uncomplicated.
HOWEVER, I have seen those near me (no, not family, at school etc) 
feeling like their lives are being torn apart as they try desperately to 
fit in. At work I see girls behave differently at work and away as they 
alter their behaviour to fit in with the group.

Asides from anomalies such as myself, I think a group-based definition 
is important to our species. Only a few of us seem to be willing to 
self-identify. So many more prefer to identify based upon what their 
peers do and think. You can see this in American "patriots". But look at 
World Cup time and see all those English flags flying. There's a sense 
of hope and pride in that (yes, even in a time that hasn't won in nearly 
half a century). Would even this exist if a person's citizenship is no 
longer granted to them? If a person born in the UK cannot automatically 
think of themselves as British... where does that leave them?

How about disaffected, forgotten, p***ed-off, unwanted, and ripe 
material for the manipulation by those of more fundamentally troublesome 
leanings?


> I'd at least like people to vote for their local councillor with the
> intention of electing their local council, not vote thinking they're
> selecting the Prime Minister.

;-)


> And I wish people would realise that 99.5% of the population can't vote
> for Tony Blair/David Cameroon/Whoever.

I wish we *could* vote for the guy leading the country. And I wish a 
change of leadership (Blair->Brown) would trigger an automatic general 
election. We can't have mid-term votes as PMships aren't of a fixed 
duration, but really we ought to have a vote every two years to 
determine the balance of power in Westminster.
But, then, this is the logical approach, perhaps not entirely useful 
with the people who:
   1. My father and my father's father voted Labour, therefore...
   2. Will vote for whoever the Sun tells them to vote for.


> I've actually had people complain to me that Tony Blair's name wasn't on
> the ballot paper when they went to vote.

It's a fair point. Numerous other countries have a fairly clear 
distinction between local elections and "leader of the country" elections.

France, recently:  Sarko vs S?go

Germany, recently: Merkel vs some unpronounceable name

US, recently:      Old git with liability vs Morgan Freeman^W^Wblack guy


These were votes for the leader of the country and the majority party in 
government. Why is it the UK isn't as clear as this?

Okay, granted, the ballot probably said "UMP" and "SNP" rather than 
Sarko and S?go, but the point still holds. Local elections are 
completely different.


> These are the people who you want to line up against^W^W^W^W^W^Wgive
> democracy a bad name.

Democracy? Britain? Where... I though ten years of Labour did a pretty 
good job of killing that, killing effective policing, and putting so 
many cack bits of legislation into effect that everybody is bound to be 
a criminal at least once a week...
   You mistakenly recycled a non-recyclable yoghurt carton?
   ASSUME THE POSITION! YOU'RE GOING DOWN &?$@"?$!!!!!!


Best wishes,

Rick.

-- 
Rick Murray, eeePC901 & ADSL WiFI'd into it, all ETLAs!
BBC B: DNFS, 2 x 5.25" floppies, EPROM prog, Acorn TTX
E01S FileStore, A3000/A5000/RiscPC/various PCs/blahblah...
<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>