Date   : Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:06:39 +0000
From   : jgh@... (J.G.Harston)
Subject: linux beebem?

Phil Blundell wrote:
>> I did take the latest BeebEm for Linux that I could find (just checked,
>> and it was V0.0.13) and ported Rob's Econet AUN patches into it.
>> I did mean at the time to forward the patches into the BeebEm for Unix
>> maintainer, but never got around to it.

I've only been cursorily following this thread, but shouldn't there be
""a"" BeebEm source, not a XXX BeebEm source and a YYY BeebEm source
and a ZZZ BeebEm source? Otherwise, whenever somebody develops some
code in "one" of the sources, everybody has to cut'n'paste it backwards
and forwards to other sources.

-- 
J.G.Harston - jgh@...