Date   : Thu, 24 Mar 1983 18:25:00 EST
From   : Charlie Strom <CSTROM@mit-mc.arpa>
Subject: CP/M-Plus

I find it very difficult to believe that a properly written banked
CP/M Plus is slower than 2.2, though this migt be the case for
non-banked (minimal) implementation. All of the people I have spoken
to who have diddled with PLUS thus far say it is considerably faster
in disk I/O, directory searches, etc., and it makes emminent sense
that it ought to be. I hope to be able to give a more first-hand
report in the not too distant future. Sounds like sour grapes to me
emanating from Oakland!