<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Wed, 19 Jun 1985 13:34:40 PDT (Wednesday)
From   : Chapman.ES@XEROX.ARPA
Subject: CP/M-80 vs. CP/M-68K

I must admit to chauvanism. I have a CP/M-80 system, and had forgotten
about CP/M-68K. If you have something you'd like to contribute, go
ahead, distinguishing CP/M-80 from CP/M-68K. What systems run CP/M-68K?

Cheryl

Return-Path: <mknox@ut-ngp.ARPA>
Received: from ut-ngp.ARPA by Xerox.ARPA ; 18 JUN 85 18:45:39 PDT
From: mknox@ut-ngp.ARPA (mknox)
Posted-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 85 20:37:22 CDT
Message-Id: <8506190137.AA01217@ut-ngp.ARPA>
Received: by ut-ngp.ARPA (4.22/4.22)
       id AA01217; Tue, 18 Jun 85 20:37:54 cdt
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 85 20:37:22 CDT
To: Chapman.ES
Subject: Reply to: request for languages which run under cp/m


Are you interested in languages for CP/M-68K, or just CP/M-80?


<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>