<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Wed, 15 Apr 1987 10:55:00 CDT
From   : <MISS049%ECNCDC.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu>
Subject: 128 CP/M COMPATABILITY

   I feel there are no differences except for the display
 codes for the monitor.  I have been running CP/M on the 128
 for about a year and have found no problems with running
 KAYPRO IV  CP/M 2.2 stuff.  New Word needed some help, but
 not much!!


   As for C, I have been using the BDS C compiler for several
 months with no problems.  I have seen AZTEC C run on another
 CP/M machine and I feel that the BDS C compiler is much better.
 There was a review of several CP/M compilers in a 1984 BYTE.
 If anyone is interested, I could come up with the exact issue.



____________________________________________________________________

 Ken Linder                                Western Illinois
 MISS049@ECNCDC.BITNET                       University


 KA9RVK (CW lives!!!!!)            Please acknowledge that my
                                  opinions are the product of
                                    one semi-intelligent human.

__________________________________________________________________
<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>