Date   : Thu, 04 Jun 1987 00:19:00 -0800
From   : Ken Wallewein <kenw%noah.arc.cdn%ubc.csnet@RELAY.CS.NET>
Subject: CONIX v/xs ZCPR

   For about the last year I've been drooling over the ads for CONIX, the
super-duper CP/M replacement. It got good reviews, and looks better than ZCPR3
in many ways. I use ZCPR2 now, but a lot of that stuff is only really useful
for hard drives and multiple users (I run dual 8" DSDD floppies and a RAM
disk). 

  However, there seems to be a lot of fuss and bother over ZCPR3, but not a 
peep about CONIX. How come? Doesn't *anybody* use it? I would really like to 
see some discussion.

  For that matter, has anybody tried out that PD BDOS replacement I read 
about recently (can't remember who by)?
/kenw
                                                                 A L B E R T A
Ken Wallewein                                                  R E S E A R C H
                                                                 C O U N C I L