<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>
Date   : Sun, 25 Sep 1988 08:24:00 MDT
From   : "Frank J. Wancho" <WANCHO@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: MARC

For the record, Ed Ziemba did the principal work in developing MARC, a
Unix-like OS for the Z80, collaborating with Lauren Weinstein and Leor
Zolman (of BDS-C fame), among others.  After Ed died in an unfortunate
and untimely snorkling accident, Lauren picked up the work.  Toward
the end of 1982, Lauren's hard disk failed, and he had to resort to
using floppy disks to regenerate the system - a slow and painful
process.

MARC required a working CP/M BIOS to use as the device interface and
provided a combination of a V6/V7 interface, an extensively reworked
runtime BDS-C library, a version of MINCE, the EMACS-like editor
from Mark of the Unicorn, and the ability to run well-behaved CP/M
programs.

Attached to the end of this message are two messages from Lauren
submitted in November 1983 announcing the demise of MARC and the
reasons why.

--Frank

Date:     Tue, 1 Nov 83 1:11:29 EST
From:     R. Bruce Natalie (CTAB) <rbn@brl-vgr>
To:       info-micro@brl-vgr, info-cpm@brl-vgr
Subject:  [lauren:  status report message]

Lauren Weinstein has sent me the following message regarding the
MARC software package.  For those of you who don't know, MARC is
an attempt to get as much of UNIX as you can on a 8080 based system.
This message was forwarded to me as list maintainer because he was
uncertain whether it would be viewed as a commercial statement and
thus be a prohibitted use of the DDN.  I find this note to be of the
informational type, which is one of the primary purposes of this list
and therefore am forwarding it on his behalf.

Mr Weinstein's mailing address is:
       <vortex!lauren@rand-unix> 

Ron Natalie
INFO-MICRO-REQUEST@BRL-VGR
INFO-CPM-REQUEST@BRL-VGR

A very brief status report on MARC:

Due to various technical problems, the rapidly advancing state of the
art in software and affordable hardware, and a variety of
marketing considerations, the MARC software project has been
terminated.  No further work is taking place on the software, and the
MARC software package will henceforth not be sold or distributed in
any manner.

Persons with specific questions on this topic may feel free to contact
me, but the decision is irrevocable.   Thanks much.

--Lauren--

Date: Thursday, 10 Nov 1983 16:56-PST
Realname: Lauren Weinstein
To: INFO-CPM@brl
Subject: Erroneous information from hp-pcd!craig about MARC
From: lauren@rand-unix

I sincerely hope that this will be my last message on this topic.

I don't know what hp-pcd!craig has been smoking, but his information
regarding MARC is absolutely and totally wrong and confused.

There isn't any "George" at Vortex.  I AM VORTEX.  VORTEX IS ME.  Period.
I will NOT be selling or distributing MARC in any manner.  
The MARC software project has been terminated.
MARC was designed only for the 8080/Z80 processors and there 
have never been any plans to distribute a MARC for the 68000 or any other 
processors.  In point of fact, the overwhelming percentage of software 
in the MARC software package is written in a non-standard 8080 assembler
and is most decidedly NOT portable in any manner.

To be blunt, the system was not really usable as other than a toy.  
Performance with floppies was miserable and could not be reasonably improved.
Even with hard disks, many operations were extremely slow.  The system
could NOT make use of additional memory over 64K in any manner, and
the useful workspace for user programs ended up being only around 30K,
sometimes even less.  CP/M compatibility did not function properly
for about 75% of currently tested CP/M programs.

The MARC software package is fundamentally limited by its original
design parameters, and has no future beyond hardware which
is rapidly heading into oblivion -- and, as I stated, it doesn't
work well enough even on that hardware.

There are a variety of software products from various vendors on
the market which can provide much of the MARC functionality
in a much more reasonable manner, and which won't ignore the entire
base of existing CP/M software in the process.  Microshell and Software
Tools are two obvious examples of reasonable approaches to the 
problem of providing such an environment on limited machines.
There are also packages which can make effective use of bank-switched
memory and provide for much faster disk access, which should help
to provide functionality for that hardware which MARC could not and cannot
provide.

MARC was a good effort but is just too fundamentally limited by the
underlying hardware base for which it was designed and written.
It is just "too much" for such hardware -- the operating system
takes up so much of the memory and disks that there just isn't
anything reasonable left for the humans!  Also very important
is the fact that MARC's being written mostly in 8080 assembler
made it difficult to maintain and modify and essentially impossible
to take forward into the future in the rapidly changing micro marketplace.

You might be interested to know that of the people I've talked to about
the termination of the project, the vast majority admitted that they
were planning to try upgrade to newer hardware (usually with lots
more memory and usually running a fullblown multiprocess Unix
or real multiprocess Unix look-alike system) in the near future. 
Most of the people (few as they were) who sounded the most disappointed
were those with hardware that would not reasonably run MARC in any case.
However, the bottom line is that bugs and poor performance would
require so much more code to fix properly that the remaining memory
space would be made even smaller and less useful!

I don't sell *or* distribute software with which I am not happy.
I never sold a single copy of the MARC software package because
I refused to send out buggy and limited software.  It doesn't
matter whether the package was going to cost $0 or $500, I simply
refuse to distribute software with which I am dissatisfied.  

I've spent a large amount of time on the project, and
I'm not happy about the final outcome -- but it's time to
face reality on this topic.  It was fun trying, anyway, but I've
made my decision and it is final -- I need to get on with my life
and try to make a living!

I really have nothing more to say about this.  That's all, folks.

--Lauren--

===================

<< Previous Message Main Index Next Message >>
<< Previous Message in Thread This Month Next Message in Thread >>