<< Previous Message | Main Index | Next Message >> |
<< Previous Message in Thread | This Month | Next Message in Thread >> |
Date : Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:09:13 +0100 From : Russell Marks <russell.marks@...> Subject: Re: Magazine test scans - Update I'm pretty sure that Paul is wrong on this one, and that Q100 JPEG is not lossless. I'm also rather dismayed at the way he's happy to call Tom Lane clueless behind his back. Still, I'm taking this to email (which will be cc'd to Tom). I'm sorry if I've wasted everyone else's time with this one. (I agree that PNG is the best choice for the scans, BTW.) -Rus.
<< Previous Message | Main Index | Next Message >> |
<< Previous Message in Thread | This Month | Next Message in Thread >> |