Date   : Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:46:11 +0100
From   : Paul Wheatley <p.r.wheatley@...>
Subject: Re: Magazine test scans - Update

How many times do I have to say "virtually identical" and appropriate for the
use that was originally suggested (i.e. storing magazine scans)?

Anyway, chill out mate, its hardly a big issue to get all upset and report me
to the JPEG police over.


The JPEG looked like the original! Please don't send me down your honour.
*;-)

Paul

Russell Marks wrote:
> 
> I'm pretty sure that Paul is wrong on this one, and that Q100 JPEG is
> not lossless. I'm also rather dismayed at the way he's happy to call
> Tom Lane clueless behind his back.
> 
> Still, I'm taking this to email (which will be cc'd to Tom). I'm sorry
> if I've wasted everyone else's time with this one.
> 
> (I agree that PNG is the best choice for the scans, BTW.)
> 
> -Rus.

-- 
Camileon Project Officer
http://www.si.umich.edu/CAMILEON/
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/camileon
0113 233 5830