Date   : Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:32:11 +0100
From   : kortink@... (John Kortink)
Subject: Modernisations

On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:22:01 +0100, I wrote:

>In general, the converter will therefore render to the target
>not at the line rate, but at the frame rate of the source.
>Hence the lag of 0.2 seconds.

I'm sorry. That should of course be 0.02. Which kind of
invalidates the point about 1 frame of delay, but does
force the question : where is the extra 9 frames of lag
coming from ? It can hardly be the converter, since there
is no point in lagging more than 1 or perhaps 2 frames
(depending on the display logic).


John Kortink