Date   : Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:43:02 +0000
From   : jgh@... (Jonathan Graham Harston)
Subject: Re: Advice on digital photographs

"A.J. Davis" <mail@...> wrote:
> has commented on the quality of the camera.  From past experience,
> I don't think Goodmans is a very good brand.
> 
> You can do all the tips and suggestions offered by everyone, but
> if the camera has a poor quality lens then nothing will improve
> the picture.
 
I'm coming to the conclusion that the problem is with the camera.
I get get much better pictures - at a distance - with my 35mm
point-and-click film camera, but it takes ages for me to get
around to processing the film and getting the pictures converted.
 
Somebody else took some photos of me at Wakefield last year with
their camera which advertises fewer pixels, but the came out much
better. I think I'll have to go to Jessop's with some sample bits
to photograph and try all their camera.
 
-- 
J.G.Harston - jgh@...                - mdfs.net/User/JGH
NOBODY expects the MACRO ARGUMENT INQUISITION!  Our chief weapon is
unexpected addressing modes... unexpected addressing modes and local
branches out of range.  Our two weapons are unexpected addressing modes and
local branches out of range and quoted argument lists.  Our *three* weapons
are unexpected addressing modes, local branches out of range, quoted
argument lists, and an almost fanatical devotion to the pope.  *Amongst* our
weapons are such elements as unexpected addressing modes, local branches out
of range... I'll come in again.